The Update On The US DOJ Wanting Google To Sell Its Chrome Browser

The US Justice Department is accusing Google of using illegal practices as a way to stay on top the online search market. A federal judge ruled in August that Google’s contracts with device manufacturers and browsers, which make it the default search engine, violate antitrust laws. These deals have allegedly affected competitors, leaving them unable to compete on equal terms.

Google’s dominance is hard to overlook. Around 90% of all global searches happen through its platform, and its Chrome browser leads the market. The Justice Department argues that this level of control harms consumers and other businesses by limiting choices in the search market.

The Justice Department’s push to go against Google is one of the largest antitrust cases in the tech industry in decades. Prosecutors argue that Google’s actions go beyond healthy competition, making intervention necessary.

 

What Actions Does the DOJ Want To Take?

 

Prosecutors have proposed that Google sell its Chrome browser. They believe this would separate the browser from the search engine, creating space for more competition. Another suggestion involves restructuring Google’s Android business or subjecting it to court oversight to prevent it from giving preferential treatment to its services.

The DOJ also wants to end Google’s agreements with manufacturers and browsers that guarantee its position as the default search engine. They argue that these agreements have locked competitors out of the market.

Finally, the agency suggests Google share its search data with rivals. This move could give smaller companies access to Google’s many resources, levelling the playing field in the search market.

 

 

How Has Google Responded?

 

Google strongly opposes the Justice Department’s proposals. The company has warned that these measures could weaken its ability to protect user privacy and security.

In a statement, Google described the DOJ’s plans as harmful to businesses and innovation. Their exact word were. “DOJ’s approach would result in unprecedented government overreach that would harm American consumers, developers, and small businesses — and jeopardise America’s global economic and technological leadership at precisely the moment it’s needed most.”

The company plans to appeal the August ruling and argues that its practices are fair and beneficial to users. Google also hinted at offering alternative solutions that could address competition concerns without requiring drastic structural changes.

 

What Setbacks Could The DOJ Face?

 

The DOJ could encounter some hiccups when it comes to implementing these remedies. Google’s appeal against the August ruling might delay or overturn the proposed measures. Experts have acknowledged that finding suitable buyers for Chrome or Android could be complicated, as the buyers must not create new antitrust issues.

Another factor is the incoming Trump administration in 2025, which may take a less aggressive stance on breaking up Google. While Donald Trump has criticised Google, he has also suggested that breaking up the company might not be the best solution.

Some experts argue that less extreme measures, such as ending Google’s default search agreements, could be enough to restore fair competition.

This case could also serve as a warning to other tech giants. Companies like Apple, Amazon, and Meta may face stricter rules over their business practices, especially if the DOJ achieves a win against Google.

Ultimately, this case could change how search engines and browsers work, giving users more choice and encouraging innovation. While the final decision may take years, this could be the start of a new era of regulating the tech industry.