For years, SEO was built around a fairly simple premise: rank the website, win the click, convert the user. Authority lived on your domain, backlinks were the currency, and Google was the ultimate gatekeeper. But now, with AI changing just about everything we do and know, that model has changed dramatically.
As AI-powered search experiences like Google’s AI Overviews become more common, a different set of winners is emerging, and they’re pretty surprising.
Wikipedia, Reddit and YouTube are consistently being surfaced, cited and summarised by AI systems – often ahead of brand websites, even those with strong traditional SEO, who used to hold the ultimate virtual authority.
And the most interesting thing is that this isn’t just a temporary quirk, nor is it a simple methodological difference in how SEO operates. Rather, it’s an ideological change – a deeper shift in how AI understands authority itself.
Now, AI Values Concensus Over Straightforward Rankings
Large language models don’t “rank” content in the same way search engines do. Instead of deciding which page deserves position one, they synthesise information from across the web, looking for consistency and corroboration – things that signal trust.
According to recent AI search visibility research from Semrush and others, platforms like Wikipedia, Reddit and YouTube appear disproportionately often in AI-generated answers.
And it’s kind of surprising – at least in my opinion. I mean, Wikipedia has long been regarded as one of the least trusted sources because its content is a combination of mostly unverified information; Reddit is simply a dialogue of often conflicting opinions; and YouTube is a format of information and content that’s never really featured in the sphere of “trusted sources”.
The reason for this change is structural. These platforms are designed around collective validation – the very reason they weren’t necessarily trusted in the past.
Wikipedia articles are edited, challenged and referenced. Reddit threads surface ideas through upvotes and debate. YouTube content accrues authority through engagement, creator credibility and repeated citation across the web.
AI systems are effectively asking a different question than Google once did. Not “which page is best optimised?” but “which information seems most agreed upon?”
This is a complete shift in values, in what we deem important and where we place our trust.
More from Artificial Intelligence
- How Many UK AIM-100 Businesses Include AI In Their Practices?
- Microsoft Reveals How Much AI And Cloud Boosted Its Revenue In 2025
- Amazon To Cut 30,000 Jobs: What Does This Say About the Future of Tech Work?
- Top AI Startups In The United Kingdom
- What Is Physical AI? The Buzzword That Dominated CES 2026
- UCL Founded AI Startup Becomes First UK Tech Unicorn Of 2026
- Before AI Comes Clean Data
- Cyber Criminals Are Using LLMs For Phishing Attacks, Here’s How
Why Do These Platforms Carry So Much Weight?
There’s a reason Wikipedia, Reddit and YouTube keep showing up, and it’s not just nostalgia or brand recognition. They share a few traits AI systems clearly favour.
They’re structured, making them easier to peruse; they’re dynamic and constantly updated rather than static; and they’re community-moderated, meaning claims are often questioned or refined. And crucially, they exist independently of brand self-promotion.
A perfectly polished landing page is still useful, but from an AI’s perspective, it’s also self-interested. A Reddit discussion where dozens of users independently describe the same product flaw or benefit looks a lot more like truth.
Jason Morris, CEO of Profit Engine, puts it bluntly when he says that platform authority now matters as much as website optimisation. AI systems are pulling signals from across the web, not just owned domains, and brands that don’t exist meaningfully outside their own site often get ignored.
Visibility Without Clicks Is the New Normal
Being cited by AI sounds like a win, until you look at the behaviour data. When an AI summary appears at the top of search results, around a quarter of users end their search immediately. Another third abandon Google altogether and continue elsewhere, but only about 1% click through to cited sources.
That creates an uncomfortable paradox for brands. You can be highly visible without seeing any traffic benefit. Your expertise is recognised, but your website remains unseen. You’re providing value without reaping any real reward.
This is where the value of AI visibility becomes highly contextual. For thought leadership, reputation and brand recall, appearing in AI summaries can be powerful. For businesses that rely on site visits to generate leads or sales, it can feel like having your knowledge given away for free.
AI search doesn’t just change discovery – it actually changes the economics of attention and the attention economy entirely.
Reddit’s Quiet Takeover of AI Answers
Of all the platforms benefiting, Reddit’s rise has been particularly striking. Its discussions are rich in first-hand experience, trade-offs and nuance – exactly the kind of material AI systems rely on to sound human and balanced.
In many AI answers, Reddit threads are effectively standing in for market research, reviews and expert commentary all at once. And that’s not because Reddit is “better” than brand content, but because it reflects how people actually talk when they’re not selling.
For brands, this is uncomfortable but it’s also instructive. AI isn’t just indexing information; it’s absorbing cultural consensus and prioritising human opinion. If your product, category or idea isn’t being discussed organically, AI systems struggle to place you.
YouTube and the Rise of Explainability
YouTube plays a very different but equally important role. Video transcripts give AI long-form, explanatory content tied to recognised creators and channels. Educational videos, tutorials and breakdowns often carry more contextual depth than written articles optimised for search.
This helps explain why YouTube citations increasingly appear in AI summaries, even for technical or professional queries. Authority here isn’t just about facts, but about explanation. Who took the time to actually teach?
Now, Authority Is Distributed, Not Owned
The biggest shift here isn’t tactical, it’s conceptual. Authority no longer lives in one place – it’s distributed across platforms, conversations and formats.
AI systems don’t care who “owns” the content. Rather, they care who the web appears to trust.
For brands, that means visibility isn’t something you can fully contro anymore – a disconcerting reality for many.
It has to be earned repeatedly, in public, across ecosystems you don’t own. Wikipedia accuracy, Reddit sentiment, YouTube education, LinkedIn credibility all feed into how AI understands who you are.
The uncomfortable truth is that AI search rewards being talked about more than talking about yourself. And that might be the most human signal of authority there is.