Marketing qualified leads and sales qualified leads create artificial barriers in customer acquisition funnels. Taylor Thomson’s solution bypassed traditional lead scoring entirely, focusing on lifetime value metrics that align rather than divide teams at performance branding agency WITHIN.
Thomson’s alternative measurement framework eliminated the traditional friction between marketing teams optimising for lead volume and sales teams focusing on conversion quality. His systematic approach to revenue operations helped transform WITHIN from a $250,000 average contract value agency to securing $1.8 million enterprise deals by abandoning conventional lead qualification processes.
The results demonstrate how organisational alignment around shared metrics can drive superior business outcomes. Thomson’s framework generated a 620% increase in average contract values and $7.6 million in incremental revenue by creating unified accountability for customer lifetime value rather than departmental optimisation around competing objectives.
The Fundamental Flaw in MQL-to-SQL Systems
Thomson’s critique of traditional lead scoring stems from his observation that marketing qualified lead and sales qualified lead classifications create artificial distinctions between activities that actually work together to influence buying decisions. His experience managing revenue operations revealed how conventional attribution often misses the most valuable prospects while creating organisational silos.
“The marketing team is basically for all intents and purposes, they care about getting a lead in the door and then they kind of wash their hands and they’re like, great,” Thomson observed during a podcast interview, describing how MQL-focused systems encourage departmental optimisation rather than customer-centric collaboration.
His analysis identified how traditional lead scoring creates competing incentives where marketing teams maximise lead quantity while sales teams optimise for closing rates, resulting in inevitable conflict when success metrics don’t align with overall business objectives or customer experience quality.
Taylor Thomson’s background in political science provided frameworks for understanding how different stakeholders with varying incentives can be aligned around common objectives rather than competing for recognition through department-specific metrics that may conflict with organisational success.
Taylor Thomson’s Lifetime Value Alternative Framework
Thomson’s alternative to traditional lead scoring centres on customer lifetime value as the primary success metric across marketing, sales, and client success functions. This approach requires organisations to fundamentally rethink campaign structure and team performance evaluation around shared accountability for long-term client relationships.
“Performance marketing would be your traditional performance driven KPI that a business might have, let’s call it whatever it might be, ROAS or CPA or what we really love is LTV,” Thomson explained, describing how lifetime value metrics provide superior measurement frameworks compared to traditional lead qualification processes.
His framework eliminates the artificial handoff points between marketing lead generation and sales conversion by creating shared responsibility for customer acquisition costs, retention rates, and expansion revenue across traditionally siloed departments and functional areas.
The lifetime value focus proved particularly valuable for WITHIN’s transition to enterprise clients, where traditional lead scoring often fails to identify the most valuable prospects due to longer sales cycles and complex decision-making processes involving multiple stakeholders and extended evaluation periods.
More from Business
- One in Three Business Failures Linked To Botched Acquisitions
- 4 New Unicorns in August 2025
- Meet The UK’s Top Scale-Ups
- These 7 Tax Mistakes Could Cost Your Small Business Thousands – Here’s How To Avoid Them
- Which VCs Have Backed The Most Unicorns?
- 8 European VCs Investing in EdTech
- What Taxes Do You Pay If You Sell Your Business In The UK?
- How Your Business Can Use VoIP While Working Abroad
Systematic Organisational Alignment Implementation
Thomson’s implementation of lifetime value measurement required comprehensive organisational restructuring beyond simply changing metrics. His systematic approach involved creating Service Level Agreements that established mutual accountability and collaboration frameworks across marketing, sales and client success teams.
“We implemented a series of department-wide Service Level Agreements (SLAs), fostering collaboration and communication among teams to drive efficiency and alignment,” Thomson documented, illustrating how formal agreements supported unified measurement approaches rather than competing departmental objectives.
The SLA framework eliminated traditional finger-pointing when deals failed to convert or clients experienced service issues by creating shared responsibility for customer lifecycle outcomes rather than departmental handoff optimisation that often obscured rather than solved underlying problems.
Thomson’s approach recognised that successful measurement framework changes require both structural modifications and cultural change management to ensure teams understand how collaboration enhances rather than threatens individual performance recognition and career advancement opportunities.
Enterprise Sales Complexity and Attribution Challenges
Thomson’s critique of MQL-to-SQL conversion becomes more pronounced when applied to enterprise sales cycles, where buying decisions involve multiple stakeholders and extended evaluation periods that make traditional attribution models inadequate for understanding marketing contribution to revenue generation.
“If you figure out the attribution question wholly, you’re good,” Thomson noted, highlighting the fundamental challenge facing marketing organisations attempting to measure complex customer journeys through linear qualification models that assume predictable progression through defined stages.
Taylor Thomson’s experience at WITHIN demonstrated how enterprise buyers consume content and engage with agencies differently than traditional B2B prospects, often interacting with multiple touchpoints over months before entering formal evaluation processes that make first-touch or last-touch attribution meaningless for understanding true marketing impact.
The complexity extends to offline interactions that traditional marketing automation systems cannot track, including conference conversations, referral discussions, and relationship-building activities that influence enterprise buying decisions but rarely appear in conventional lead scoring systems focused on digital engagement measurement.
Performance Measurement Revolution
Thomson’s lifetime value framework creates comprehensive performance measurement that accounts for the full customer relationship rather than optimising individual conversion points. This approach requires sophisticated tracking capabilities but provides more accurate assessment of marketing and sales effectiveness across extended customer lifecycles.
“We developed the company’s first-ever comprehensive revenue model and dashboard, providing invaluable insights to executive leadership and supporting overall business strategy,” Thomson documented, showing how unified measurement frameworks enhance rather than complicate performance visibility and accountability.
His revenue model development enabled leadership to understand how different activities contribute to customer lifetime value generation, creating foundations for resource allocation decisions based on comprehensive rather than departmental performance metrics that often conflict with overall business objectives.
The dashboard implementation provided real-time visibility into customer relationship health and lifetime value trends, enabling proactive rather than reactive management of customer acquisition and retention challenges that traditional MQL-to-SQL systems often obscure through artificial qualification barriers.
Sustainable Competitive Advantage Through Unified Metrics
Thomson’s success eliminating MQL-to-SQL conversion problems demonstrates how organisational alignment around customer lifetime value can create sustainable competitive advantages that traditional lead scoring approaches cannot replicate. His systematic approach to measurement framework implementation provides templates for other organisations seeking to improve conversion quality.
The 620% increase in average contract values reflects improved team coordination that enhanced client experience throughout the sales and service lifecycle rather than optimising individual departmental metrics that may conflict with customer satisfaction and long-term relationship quality.
Thomson’s framework continues operating effectively as WITHIN has grown and evolved, suggesting that well-designed measurement systems can scale with business development while maintaining focus on customer lifetime value rather than artificial qualification stages that create barriers to authentic relationship building and strategic account development.
His systematic approach to eliminating MQL-to-SQL friction illustrates broader principles about how measurement frameworks influence organisational behaviour and business performance outcomes through aligned incentives and shared accountability for customer success rather than departmental optimisation.
