A New York lawyer has been ordered to explain why he should not be disciplined after using ChatGPT for legal research.
The original case in question involved a man suing an airline over an alleged personal injury. His legal team, made up of lawyers from the firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman submitted a court document on his behalf. The document contained a list of legal cases to prove, using precedent, why the case should be considered.
However upon closer inspection, the airline’s lawyers said they could not find a number of the cases mentioned in the brief.
“Six of the submitted cases appear to be bogus judicial decisions with bogus quotes and bogus internal citations,” Judge Castel wrote in an order demanding the man’s legal team explain itself.
More from News
- How Does Google Intend On Producing 15 Million AI Chips Over The Next Two Years?
- TikTok Parent ByteDance Has Officially Passed The $4 Billion Mark In AI Revenue
- Russia’s Latest Move Against Pavel Durov Shows That Telegram Is No Longer Just A Messaging App
- Experts React To The UK’s Decision To Make Tech Subjects Compulsory In Schools
- Microsoft Has Confirmed Copilot’s Super App Will Launch Soon – But What Is It For?
- G2A.COM’s Autonomous AI Agent Dave Helps Sellers Resolve 14,400 Support Tickets In 63 Days
- Why One MedTech Company Chose a Computer Graphics Conference To Launch Its Next AI Platform
- 75% Of CEOs Don’t Think Marketing Drives Growth – What Are They Missing?
Despite ChatGPT having a disclaimer that it can produce inaccurate information, the lawyer who used the tool told the court he was “unaware that its content could be false”.
Mr Schwartz, a lawyer at the firm who prepared the document, said that he “greatly regrets” using the chatbot, which he had never used before.
He has vowed to never use AI to “supplement” his legal research in future “without absolute verification of its authenticity”.
The event comes as a warning that although AI like ChatGPT is a useful tool for information gathering, it should be used with caution, especially in professional environments.
Whilst it can provide human-like responses, it uses the internet as it was in 2021 as its database meaning some of its information can be outdated.
