Watermarks are widely used by creatives and business people, from photographers and designers to business owners more generally, to protect their images from unauthorised use.
While the use of watermarks has, in the past, been pretty successful at making images almost completely unusable for those not willing to pay for them, technology is completely changing this. With advancements in artificial intelligence, removing watermarks has become easier than ever.
In fact, a recent report reveals that Google’s latest AI model is being used to erase watermarks from images with astonishing accuracy – not only are the results really impressive, but you’d actually struggle to identify that they were even there in the first place.
Naturally, this has led to plenty of concerns about copyright infringement issues and digital content security. Other platforms like Photoshop and online tools also offer ways to remove or obscure watermarks, sometimes with just a few clicks. So, is it okay to remove watermarks, especially if everyone’s doing it anyway?
Well, unsurprisingly, it’s more complicated than that, and if this feels a little bit icky, that’s because it kind of is.
Is it even legal? And how does the technology behind watermark removal work?
Well, it’s not as simple as a straightforward yes or no, because the legality pertains more specifically but how an image is actually used. So, it’s really important to explore the actual methods used to erase watermarks, how they work and what the real-world ethical and legal implications are.
That is, how does this affect creatives and content creators, and what can they do to protect themselves and their work?
As AI continues to evolve, watermarking may no longer be a foolproof way to safeguard digital assets, so what’s next for online image protection?
What Exactly Is Watermarking And How Does It Work?
Watermarking is a technique used to protect digital images by embedding a visible or invisible mark like a logo, text or a pattern onto a picture. It’s used as a deterrent against unauthorised use, ensuring that credit is given to the original creator and preventing theft of creative content. Most commonly, watermarks are used by photographers, stock image platforms and businesses to protect intellectual property.
There are two main types of watermarking: visible and invisible. Visible watermarks are overlaid on an image, and they’re normally semi-transparent to maintain visibility while still marking ownership. Invisible watermarks, on the other hand, are embedded within the image’s metadata or pixel structure which makes them a lot more difficult to detect and remove.
Watermarks work by altering specific parts of an image, making it difficult to erase them without compromising quality. But, while this used to be a pretty fool-prof method, the rise of advanced AI tools is changing this. Removing watermarks has become increasingly possible which, naturally, is raising concerns about copyright protection in the digital era.
More from Tech
- Best Tech and Apps for Preventing Phone Theft
- How Can Crypto and Blockchain Technology Contribute Meaningfully to Tackling Financial Exclusion?
- World Bicycle Day: Tech Used At The 2025 Giro d’Italia
- Meet Ada: The Accurate Carbon Insights Tool
- Tech And Apps For Your Blood Pressure Monitoring
- Spreadsheet SDKs and the Role they Play in Modern Retail Data Management
- How Reliable Data Access Protects Businesses From Unexpected Downtime
- UK Finance Firms At Risk Of Digital Exclusion Ahead of Global Accessibility Day
Removing Watermarks: How It Works
There are various techniques that can be used to remove watermarks from images, ranging from basic photo editing to advanced artificial intelligence.
Traditional methods involve manually using editing software like Photoshop to clone or blur the watermark which requires a fair bit of skill and patience to maintain the image’s quality. Some tools use content-aware fill technology, which intelligently replaces the watermark with surrounding pixels to make it less noticeable.
More recently, however, AI-driven tools have revolutionised watermark removal. Advanced machine learning models like Google’s latest AI system can detect and remove watermarks with astonishing precision in seconds. These tools analyse the image, predict what the covered area should look like and seamlessly reconstruct the missing details – it’s like it was never there.
While these technologies can be useful for legitimate purposes like restoring damaged images, they also pose ethical and legal challenges if they’re used for nefarious reasons. As watermark removal becomes easier, copyright holders need to explore new ways to protect their content from unauthorised use.
Ethical Concerns: Where Does the Onus Lie?
The removal of watermarks raises significant ethical concerns, particularly regarding copyright infringement and intellectual property rights.
Watermarks exist to protect creators, ensuring they receive proper credit and preventing unauthorised use of their work. When individuals or businesses remove these marks without permission, they effectively strip away ownership, allowing images to be used without compensation or recognition.
With AI-powered tools making watermark removal effortless, there’s no doubt about the fact that the potential for misuse has increased. Artists, photographers and stock image providers may struggle to protect their content, leading to financial losses and a devaluation of creative work. Also, removing watermarks can contribute to misinformation, as altered images may be used without context or attribution.
Now, while some may argue that watermark removal has legitimate uses like restoring personal photos, its widespread availability presents challenges for copyright protection. As technology advances, there is a growing need for stronger digital rights management and ethical AI usage policies.
So, where does the onus lie? Who’s responsible for the fact that watermarks are being removed and images are being used illegally?
Opinions may vary, but ultimately, the fact that a platform allows people do remove watermarks doesn’t necessarily make them responsible for what users end up doing with those images – especially since there are plenty of innocent reasons one would want to use this kind of technology.
Ultimately, it’s the responsibility of the individual using the image that’s had a watermark removed – if you remove a watermark from an image (or even use an image that you know has had a watermark removed) and use it in such a way that violates its legal terms of use, that’s on you.
That doesn’t mean that it’s okay for these platforms and technologies to encourage illegal activity. In fact, an argument can be made that they should be responsible for issuing disclaimers about how the tech should and should not be used, alongside a reminder of the law.
Either way, it ultimately comes down to the user, and that’s where the majority of the responsibility lies.
