Clearview AI, a facial recognition firm, has offered the Ukraine government its services for free. These services could help the country uncover Russian infiltrators, identify the dead and tackle misinformation.
It’s said that the company offers a searchable database of 10 billion faces. This database has been sourced from the web, with the tech having previously been hit with fines from industry regulators.
How Could the Tool Be Used?
Clearview AI’s offering was sent to the Ukrainian government in a letter, which was first reported by Reuters. In this, the firm claim a substantial amount of its facial database has been drawn from social media platforms in Russia, with over two billion images from what’s been known as the “Facebook of Russia” – Vkontakte.
The letter details a number of scenarios where the Clearview AI technology could be used, including those that have been previously mentioned (the identification of infiltrators, identifying the dead, tackling misinformation) as well as reuniting family without needing their paperwork.
More from News
- Australia Is Drafting An AI Safety Regulator After An OpenAI Model Hacked A Government Site – What Will It Be Able To Enforce?
- Waymo’s Software Fix Was Supposed To Make Robotaxis Safer – Why Are Regulators Still Concerned?
- Uh Oh, Elon, Texas Just Turned Blue. Will Tesla Hit The Road Again, Or Will Big Tech Have To Adapt?
- Huntress Offers Breached Businesses 60 Days Of Free Protection To Stop Hackers Coming Back
- Finite State Raises $27 Million To Help Device Makers Fight ‘Vulnpocalypse’ With AI-Powered Product Security
- The EU’s Digital Fairness Act Wants To Take On Online Manipulation And AI – What Would Change For Consumers?
- Three Companies, Three Chinese AI Models – What Do Revolut, Airbnb And DoorDash Have In Common?
- Nvidia, Jensen Huang And A Potential Below-The-Belt Security Scandal: Are We Equating Tabloid Fodder With Genuine Corporate Risk?
Clearview AI has faced criticism from privacy watchdogs, and was hit with fines including a provisional £17m in November from the Information Commissioners Office (ICO) and 20m euros by Italian regulators.
Concerns have also been reported on whether the technology could backfire; whether it could potentially misidentify those at checkpoints and, as Surveillance Technology Oversight Project’s Albert Fox Cahn commented to Reuters “harming the very people it’s supposed to help.”
