Researchers in Denmark and Sweden have ventured into a new frontier of artificial intelligence (AI) – predicting political inclinations based on facial characteristics. The study used a dataset of 3,233 images, all of which depicted Danish political candidates. The researchers focused solely on the faces, dismissing all other elements from the pictures.
The crux of this research lay in the application of deep learning techniques. These powerful algorithms predicted whether the subjects of the images leaned towards the left or right-wing political ideologies. The results were surprising. The AI was able to make accurate predictions 61% of the time.
The Emotion-Politics Connection
The study found interesting correlations between facial expressions and political affiliations. Conservative candidates were more likely to have happy expressions, often depicted by their smiles. In contrast, liberal candidates tended to portray more neutral facial expressions.
More from News
- Amazon’s Same-Day And Next-Day Delivery Now In 4000 More Areas
- Valutico Acquires AI Innovator Paraloq Analytics to Revolutionise Private Company Analysis
- How Do UK Consumers Spend Their Disposable Income?
- Spain Tops The List As Most Productive European Country
- Industry Leaders Share Their Thoughts On The Recent Interest Rate Hold
- Bank Of England Holds Interest Rates At 4.25%, What Does This Mean For UK?
- One Of The Largest Data Breach In History Leaked 16 Billion Passwords
- 23andMe Co-Founder Bids To Buy Back Data After Company Announces Bankruptcy
The Attractiveness Quotient and Politics
The study discovered a distinct correlation between attractiveness and political views, particularly for women. Female politicians deemed more attractive according to a facial beauty database were more likely to hold conservative views. However, a similar correlation between attractiveness, gauged by masculine features, and right-wing ideologies was not found for men.
AI: A Double-Edged Sword?
The groundbreaking study not only demonstrated AI’s predictive power but also underscored potential threats to privacy. In an era where facial photographs are readily accessible, this could present significant implications. For instance, employers could potentially utilise such AI tools during the hiring process, leading to bias based on political ideologies.
This study also raises broader concerns about AI’s role in reinforcing societal biases, particularly around beauty standards and gender. The AI models, trained on pre-existing notions around beauty and gender, can unwittingly perpetuate stereotypes, thereby influencing specific outcomes in areas like recruitment.
A separate study found that DALL-E 2, an AI-image generator, linked titles such as ‘CEO’ or ‘director’ with white men 97% of the time, further fuelling the concern over AI perpetuating racial stereotypes.
AI’s foray into predicting political views based on facial characteristics is an exciting development. However, it also flags vital issues around privacy and the risk of reinforcing societal biases. It’s crucial that we navigate this brave new world of AI with due caution, balancing innovation with ethical considerations to ensure a fair and unbiased digital future.
